Email interception via unchecked SMTP certificate hostname
Published May 15, 2020 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
Improper certificate validation in Red Hat build of Keycloak before 10.0.0 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept SMTP email. DefaultEmailSenderProvider.setupTruststore fails to enable JavaMail server-identity checking, so TLS accepts a trusted certificate issued for another host. Exploitation requires control of the SMTP network path and an email-triggering action; intercepted messages can disclose sensitive links or content.
Summary
What happened
Improper certificate validation in Red Hat build of Keycloak before 10.0.0 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept SMTP email. DefaultEmailSenderProvider.setupTruststore fails to enable JavaMail server-identity checking, so TLS accepts a trusted certificate issued for another host. Exploitation requires control of the SMTP network path and an email-triggering action; intercepted messages can disclose sensitive links or content.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-1758
- Published
- May 15, 2020
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- Red Hat
- Product
- Red Hat build of Keycloak
- Classifications
- CWE-297, CWE-295, T1557
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 15, 2020CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=keycloak versions before 10.0.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo