Cross-site scripting via unsanitized name parameters
Published Nov 2, 2021 · Updated Oct 25, 2024
Stored cross-site scripting in Fortinet FortiClient EMS 6.4.1 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject script through name fields. Various server sections accept the name parameter without neutralizing script or tag content before web-page generation; Fortinet does not identify the affected handlers. Exploitation requires authenticated access and user interaction, allowing injected content to modify data in another security scope.
Summary
What happened
Stored cross-site scripting in Fortinet FortiClient EMS 6.4.1 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject script through name fields. Various server sections accept the name parameter without neutralizing script or tag content before web-page generation; Fortinet does not identify the affected handlers. Exploitation requires authenticated access and user interaction, allowing injected content to modify data in another security scope.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-15940
- Published
- Nov 2, 2021
- Updated
- Oct 25, 2024
- Vendor
- Fortinet
- Product
- FortiClient EMS
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 2, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 25, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=FortiClientEMS 6.4.1, 6.4.0, 6.2.9, 6.2.8, 6.2.7, 6.2.6, 6.2.4, 6.2.3, 6.2.2, 6.2.1, 6.2.0, 6.0.8, 6.0.6, 6.0.5, 6.0.4, 6.0.3, 6.0.2, 6.0.1, 6.0.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo