Remote service crash via conflicting framing headers
Published Jun 10, 2021 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
NULL pointer dereference in mod_proxy_http in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.41 through 2.4.46 allows remote attackers to crash the server. The module mishandles proxy requests containing both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers and dereferences a null pointer. The request must reach an enabled mod_proxy_http proxy route; exploitation terminates an httpd process and interrupts service without exposing or modifying data.
Summary
What happened
NULL pointer dereference in mod_proxy_http in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.41 through 2.4.46 allows remote attackers to crash the server. The module mishandles proxy requests containing both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers and dereferences a null pointer. The request must reach an enabled mod_proxy_http proxy route; exploitation terminates an httpd process and interrupts service without exposing or modifying data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-13950
- Published
- Jun 10, 2021
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- The Apache Software Foundation
- Product
- Apache HTTP Server
- Classifications
- CWE-476, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 10, 2021CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=2.4.41
- Affected versionversion=2.4.43
- Affected versionversion=2.4.46
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo