Information disclosure via unsecured JMX registry rebind
Published May 14, 2020 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
Information disclosure in Apache Camel JMX 2.22.x through 2.25.0 and 3.0.0 through 3.1.0 allows remote attackers to read sensitive data. The camel-management JMX connector creates its own RMI registry, whose existing binding remote clients can replace because the registry is not properly secured. Exploitation requires the optional camel-management JAR and a remotely reachable JMX connector; a successful rebind can redirect management clients and expose sensitive information.
Summary
What happened
Information disclosure in Apache Camel JMX 2.22.x through 2.25.0 and 3.0.0 through 3.1.0 allows remote attackers to read sensitive data. The camel-management JMX connector creates its own RMI registry, whose existing binding remote clients can replace because the registry is not properly secured. Exploitation requires the optional camel-management JAR and a remotely reachable JMX connector; a successful rebind can redirect management clients and expose sensitive information.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-11971
- Published
- May 14, 2020
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- The Apache Software Foundation
- Product
- Apache Camel
- Classifications
- T1557
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 14, 2020CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=Apache Camel 2.22.x, 2.23.x, 2.24.x, 2.25.0, 3.0.0 up to 3.1.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo