Code execution via RmiProvider polymorphic deserialization
Published Mar 31, 2020 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
Deserialization in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.10.4 allows remote attackers to execute code through crafted JSON. When unsafe polymorphic default typing is enabled, Jackson accepts a type identifier for org.apache.commons.proxy.provider.remoting.RmiProvider instead of rejecting the gadget class. Exploitation requires Commons Proxy on the classpath, attacker-controlled JSON reaching deserialization, and application processing; successful use executes code in the application's security context.
Summary
What happened
Deserialization in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.10.4 allows remote attackers to execute code through crafted JSON. When unsafe polymorphic default typing is enabled, Jackson accepts a type identifier for org.apache.commons.proxy.provider.remoting.RmiProvider instead of rejecting the gadget class. Exploitation requires Commons Proxy on the classpath, attacker-controlled JSON reaching deserialization, and application processing; successful use executes code in the application's security context.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-11112
- Published
- Mar 31, 2020
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- Debian
- Product
- Debian GNU/Linux
- Classifications
- CWE-502, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 31, 2020CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=8.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo