Remote code execution via ActiveMQ serialization gadgets
Published Mar 31, 2020 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
Unsafe deserialization in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 allows remote attackers to execute code through crafted JSON. When unsafe polymorphic Default Typing resolves attacker-supplied type identifiers, the block list permits ActiveMQ pool gadget classes to be instantiated during data binding. Exploitation requires an application to accept untrusted JSON, enable unsafe Default Typing, include a compatible ActiveMQ library, and involve user interaction.
Summary
What happened
Unsafe deserialization in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 allows remote attackers to execute code through crafted JSON. When unsafe polymorphic Default Typing resolves attacker-supplied type identifiers, the block list permits ActiveMQ pool gadget classes to be instantiated during data binding. Exploitation requires an application to accept untrusted JSON, enable unsafe Default Typing, include a compatible ActiveMQ library, and involve user interaction.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-11111
- Published
- Mar 31, 2020
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- Debian
- Product
- Debian GNU/Linux
- Classifications
- CWE-502
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 31, 2020CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=8.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo