Minting-baton destruction via premature parent-count rejection
Published May 12, 2020 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
Incorrect comparison in Simple Ledger SLP-Validate before 1.2.1 allows remote attackers to make valid MINT transactions fail validation. ValidatorType1 rejects any MINT transaction with multiple candidate parents before validating which parent carries the minting baton. A wallet that trusts this false-negative result and spends the rejected token inputs can permanently destroy the affected user's minting baton.
Summary
What happened
Incorrect comparison in Simple Ledger SLP-Validate before 1.2.1 allows remote attackers to make valid MINT transactions fail validation. ValidatorType1 rejects any MINT transaction with multiple candidate parents before validating which parent carries the minting baton. A wallet that trusts this false-negative result and spends the rejected token inputs can permanently destroy the affected user's minting baton.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-11072
- Published
- May 12, 2020
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- Simple Ledger
- Product
- SLP-Validate
- Classifications
- CWE-697
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 12, 2020CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 1.2.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo