Request smuggling via chunk-size integer overflow
Published May 26, 2020 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
HTTP request smuggling in Red Hat Undertow before 2.1.1.Final allows remote attackers to desynchronize HTTP message boundaries. ChunkReader shifts each hexadecimal chunk-size digit into a signed long without first checking for overflow, so an oversized value wraps before framing is enforced. No authentication or user interaction is required, and successful desynchronization can expose or alter requests processed on a shared connection.
Summary
What happened
HTTP request smuggling in Red Hat Undertow before 2.1.1.Final allows remote attackers to desynchronize HTTP message boundaries. ChunkReader shifts each hexadecimal chunk-size digit into a signed long without first checking for overflow, so an oversized value wraps before framing is enforced. No authentication or user interaction is required, and successful desynchronization can expose or alter requests processed on a shared connection.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-10719
- Published
- May 26, 2020
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- Red Hat
- Product
- Undertow
- Classifications
- CWE-444, CAPEC-33, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 26, 2020CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=Versions before 2.1.1.Final
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo