Privilege escalation and service interruption via insecure defaults
Published Jun 24, 2020 · Updated Sep 17, 2024
Incorrect default permissions in MiR100 2.8.1.1 and earlier allow authorized local attackers to escalate privileges or interrupt service. The controller's Ubuntu Server 16.04 configuration assigns unsafe file and home-directory permissions and exposes race-prone file creation. Access requires an authorized local robot OS account, which the vendor says is limited to MiR support; abuse can gain elevated access or cause denial of service.
Summary
What happened
Incorrect default permissions in MiR100 2.8.1.1 and earlier allow authorized local attackers to escalate privileges or interrupt service. The controller's Ubuntu Server 16.04 configuration assigns unsafe file and home-directory permissions and exposes race-prone file creation. Access requires an authorized local robot OS account, which the vendor says is limited to MiR support; abuse can gain elevated access or cause denial of service.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2020-10279
- Published
- Jun 24, 2020
- Updated
- Sep 17, 2024
- Vendor
- Mobile Industrial Robots A/S
- Product
- MiR100
- Classifications
- CWE-362, CWE-276, CWE-1188, T1068
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 24, 2020CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 17, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=v2.8.1.1 and before
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo