Service crash via unchecked packet offset underflow
Published Mar 26, 2020 · Updated Aug 4, 2024
Memory corruption in CODESYS GatewayService before 3.5.16.10 allows remote attackers to crash the process with a crafted packet. RouterGetBlkAddresses fails to validate packet-derived offsets before subtracting one from the packet length, so an integer underflow becomes the size argument for a stack-destination memcpy. An unauthenticated TCP connection to the gateway service is sufficient, and exploitation terminates GatewayService rather than altering or disclosing data.
Summary
What happened
Memory corruption in CODESYS GatewayService before 3.5.16.10 allows remote attackers to crash the process with a crafted packet. RouterGetBlkAddresses fails to validate packet-derived offsets before subtracting one from the packet length, so an integer underflow becomes the size argument for a stack-destination memcpy. An unauthenticated TCP connection to the gateway service is sufficient, and exploitation terminates GatewayService rather than altering or disclosing data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2019-5105
- Published
- Mar 26, 2020
- Updated
- Aug 4, 2024
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-119, CWE-787, CWE-125, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 26, 2020CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 4, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Cisco Talos TCP crash proof of conceptfunctional · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo