Key certification forgery via SHA-1 collisions
Published Mar 20, 2020 · Updated Aug 5, 2024
Signature forgery in GnuPG before 2.2.18 allows attackers to make colliding SHA-1 key certifications appear valid. Web-of-Trust validation accepts SHA-1 identity signatures whose chosen-prefix collisions let a certification transfer between keys with different identities. Exploitation requires crafted colliding key material and reliance on the resulting certification; GnuPG 2.x does not create SHA-1 signatures by default.
Summary
What happened
Signature forgery in GnuPG before 2.2.18 allows attackers to make colliding SHA-1 key certifications appear valid. Web-of-Trust validation accepts SHA-1 identity signatures whose chosen-prefix collisions let a certification transfer between keys with different identities. Exploitation requires crafted colliding key material and reliance on the resulting certification; GnuPG 2.x does not create SHA-1 signatures by default.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2019-14855
- Published
- Mar 20, 2020
- Updated
- Aug 5, 2024
- Vendor
- Red Hat
- Product
- GnuPG 2
- Classifications
- CWE-326
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 20, 2020CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 5, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=2.2.18
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- SHA-1 chosen-prefix collision PGP impersonation demonstrationfunctional · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo