Client crash via malformed hidden-service descriptor parsing
Published Jan 24, 2020 · Updated Aug 6, 2024
Denial of service in Tor before 0.2.4.27, 0.2.5.x before 0.2.5.12, and 0.2.6.x before 0.2.6.7 allows remote servers to crash clients. The hidden-service descriptor parser processes a malformed server-supplied descriptor until an invariant check triggers an assertion instead of rejecting the input. Any server selected to supply a descriptor can therefore exit the client process and interrupt Tor connections, without reported confidentiality or integrity impact.
Summary
What happened
Denial of service in Tor before 0.2.4.27, 0.2.5.x before 0.2.5.12, and 0.2.6.x before 0.2.6.7 allows remote servers to crash clients. The hidden-service descriptor parser processes a malformed server-supplied descriptor until an invariant check triggers an assertion instead of rejecting the input. Any server selected to supply a descriptor can therefore exit the client process and interrupt Tor connections, without reported confidentiality or integrity impact.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2015-2929
- Published
- Jan 24, 2020
- Updated
- Aug 6, 2024
- Vendor
- The Tor Project
- Product
- Tor
- Classifications
- T1499
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 24, 2020CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 6, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0.2.5.x before 0.2.5.12
- Affected versionversion=0.2.6.x before 0.2.6.7
- Affected versionversion=before 0.2.4.27
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo