Server-side request forgery through attacker-selected SVG URLs
Published Oct 16, 2024 · Updated Apr 8, 2026
Server-side request forgery in Mapplic 6.1 and earlier and Mapplic Lite 1.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to fetch URLs via SVG maps. Published references do not identify the responsible function; they state only that an attacker-selected SVG URL causes a server-originated request. No authentication or user interaction is required, and a fetched malicious SVG can execute script in the site context after the server request.
Summary
What happened
Server-side request forgery in Mapplic 6.1 and earlier and Mapplic Lite 1.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to fetch URLs via SVG maps. Published references do not identify the responsible function; they state only that an attacker-selected SVG URL causes a server-originated request. No authentication or user interaction is required, and a fetched malicious SVG can execute script in the site context after the server request.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2012-10018
- Published
- Oct 16, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 8, 2026
- Vendor
- Sekler
- Product
- Mapplic - Custom Interactive Map WordPress Plugin
- Classifications
- CWE-918, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 16, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <6.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Packet Storm Mapplic Lite SSRF and XSS exploitproof of concept · unverified
- Packet Storm Mapplic SSRF and XSS exploitproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo